Long Story Short
Plain English with Derek Thompson cover art

Plain English with Derek Thompson

Friday, June 5, 2026

What 400,000 Essays Reveal About AI and Creativity

A Georgetown neuroscientist studied 400,000 college essays and found that AI makes writing look more creative while quietly homogenizing the underlying ideas — and warns that over-reliance on AI risks long-term atrophy of human creative thinking.

Key takeaways

  • AI breaks the word-idea link. Historically, more varied vocabulary correlated with more original ideas. AI severs that connection: post-ChatGPT essays scored higher on surface-level creativity but converged on narrower, more similar ideas across students.
  • Creativity experts were fooled. Twenty-two creativity experts rated AI-assisted essays as more creative than pre-AI essays — and AI detection tools were also tricked. Our intuitive sensors for originality no longer work reliably.
  • Homogenization is the real danger, not individual quality. A single AI-written story can be excellent; the problem emerges at scale, when the diversity of ideas across many works collapses into a narrow band.
  • Ideas "outside the bots" are genuinely good. Students whose essays fell outside the AI homogenization zone went on to earn higher GPAs — suggesting human divergent thinking produces real, not just different, value.
  • The process matters as much as the product. Creative work is healthy for cognition, emotional well-being, and development. Outsourcing the process to AI, even when the output is better, removes those benefits.
  • AI amplifies majority voices. Training data skews toward published, culturally dominant writing, so AI disproportionately erases the distinctive voices of underrepresented groups.

People, organizations, products, and links mentioned

  • Adam Green — neuroscientist, Georgetown University; leads the national research team on creativity and AI
  • James Kaufman — creativity researcher, co-leading the Creativity Ontology Project with Green (200 researchers worldwide)
  • Commonwealth Short Story Prize — prestigious literary fiction award; a 2026 winner was found to be largely AI-written
  • Stony Brook / Columbia / University of Michigan — joint 2025 study showing fine-tuned ChatGPT writing was preferred over MFA-trained writers
  • Rebecca Winthrop — cited for a New York Times essay on AI generating words separately from the thoughts they represent
  • ChatGPT / Claude — mentioned as tools students use for essay writing
  • Plain English with Derek Thompson — the podcast

Notable moments

  • Green coins the phrase "outside the bots" (B-O-T-S) to describe human ideas that fall outside AI's homogenized zone — and notes those ideas correlate with better academic outcomes.
  • Thompson's analogy: AI is like a musician who can synthesize every instrument but plays the same four chords in every song — Green confirms it captures the finding well.
  • Green's advice to professors on day one: "If what you're generating is what I could get from AI, then you have no value in the new economy."
  • The gym metaphor closes the episode: leaning on AI to lift all the cognitive weights for six months leaves your mind as atrophied as a body that hasn't exercised.

Time saved

The episode runtime is listed as unknown, but the transcript spans roughly 53 minutes of content. This summary saves approximately 50–52 minutes of listening time.

Home